• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Khalil, F., Ouda, S., Ewis, M. (2008). COMPARISON BETWEEN CROPWAT AND YIELD-STRESS MODELS IN PREDICTING SESAME YIELD AND CONSUMPTIVE USE UNDER WATER STRESS CONDITIONS. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 33(12), 9105-9119. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2008.200462
F. A. Khalil; Samiha A. Ouda; M. M. Ewis. "COMPARISON BETWEEN CROPWAT AND YIELD-STRESS MODELS IN PREDICTING SESAME YIELD AND CONSUMPTIVE USE UNDER WATER STRESS CONDITIONS". Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 33, 12, 2008, 9105-9119. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2008.200462
Khalil, F., Ouda, S., Ewis, M. (2008). 'COMPARISON BETWEEN CROPWAT AND YIELD-STRESS MODELS IN PREDICTING SESAME YIELD AND CONSUMPTIVE USE UNDER WATER STRESS CONDITIONS', Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 33(12), pp. 9105-9119. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2008.200462
Khalil, F., Ouda, S., Ewis, M. COMPARISON BETWEEN CROPWAT AND YIELD-STRESS MODELS IN PREDICTING SESAME YIELD AND CONSUMPTIVE USE UNDER WATER STRESS CONDITIONS. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2008; 33(12): 9105-9119. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2008.200462

COMPARISON BETWEEN CROPWAT AND YIELD-STRESS MODELS IN PREDICTING SESAME YIELD AND CONSUMPTIVE USE UNDER WATER STRESS CONDITIONS

Article 5, Volume 33, Issue 12, December 2008, Page 9105-9119  XML PDF (781.92 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jssae.2008.200462
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
F. A. Khalil; Samiha A. Ouda; M. M. Ewis
Water Requirements and Field Irrigation Research Department; Soil, Water, and Environment Research Institute; Agricultural Research Center; Egypt.
Abstract
 
Both CROPWAT and Yield-Stress models were validated using data from two field experiments conducted at Shandaweel Agriculture Research Station, Egypt in 2007 and 2008 growing seasons. The aim of the experiment was to study the effect of imposing water stress on sesame yield and consumptive use. Four sesame varieties namely Giza 32, Toshky 1, Shandaweel 3 and Sohag 3 were used, in addition to two different irrigation treatments (irrigation after depletion of 50% and 70% of total available soil moisture).The results indicated that both CROPWAT and Yield-Stress models predicted yield reduction and consumptive use as a result of water stress for both irrigation treatments over both growing seasons with high degree of accuracy. However, Yield-Stress model predicted values of sesame yield and consumptive use were more close to the measured values, compared with the values of CROPWAT model. This could be attributed to the method that Yield-Stress model uses to predict yield, compared with CROPWAT model method, which is percent reduction in the yield as a result of water stress. Furthermore, the highly accurate prediction of Yield-Stress of consumptive use could be attributed to using daily measurements of weather parameters, not monthly measurements that CROPWAT uses. Prediction results also indicated that if irrigation water was applied when 80% of total available water was depleted, CROPWAT predicted reduction in sesame yield by 13.8 and 13.3%, in both growing seasons, whereas Yield-Stress predicted 13.6 and 13.9% reduction. Therefore, under deficit irrigation procedure irrigation water should be applied when 70% of total available soil moisture was depleted to avoid high yield decrease.
Keywords
Soil water balance; irrigation scheduling models; total available water; evapotranspiration; sesame yield
Statistics
Article View: 205
PDF Download: 435
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.