• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Rashad, M., Zedan, A., Khedr, A. (2021). Creating Software to Design a Low-Head Bubbler Irrigation System as an Alternative to Traditional Furrow Irrigation. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 12(11), 797-803. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2021.209206
M. A. Rashad; A. M. I. Zedan; A. F. Khedr. "Creating Software to Design a Low-Head Bubbler Irrigation System as an Alternative to Traditional Furrow Irrigation". Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 12, 11, 2021, 797-803. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2021.209206
Rashad, M., Zedan, A., Khedr, A. (2021). 'Creating Software to Design a Low-Head Bubbler Irrigation System as an Alternative to Traditional Furrow Irrigation', Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 12(11), pp. 797-803. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2021.209206
Rashad, M., Zedan, A., Khedr, A. Creating Software to Design a Low-Head Bubbler Irrigation System as an Alternative to Traditional Furrow Irrigation. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2021; 12(11): 797-803. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2021.209206

Creating Software to Design a Low-Head Bubbler Irrigation System as an Alternative to Traditional Furrow Irrigation

Article 14, Volume 12, Issue 11, November 2021, Page 797-803  XML PDF (1.16 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jssae.2021.209206
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M. A. Rashad email 1; A. M. I. Zedan2; A. F. Khedr3
1Agric. Eng., Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Suez Canal Univ.
2Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Zagazig U., Egypt.
3Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Suez Canal U., Egypt.
Abstract
Freshwater scarcity has become a global issue, and agriculture is the major water consumer, pushing researchers to look for methods to improve water usage efficiency. The research aims to create design software for a simple low-head bubbler as a water-saving alternative to a traditional furrow irrigation system. The specified bubblers, having an inside diameter (ID) of 8.8 to 13.6 mm and a height of 0.5 m, were hydraulically evaluated in the lab at low effective pressures ranging from 1 to 13 kPa. There are two methods for estimating bubbler discharges (qb) by the design model: using equation from the laboratory bubblers evaluation (E1) or using theoretical calculations (E2). The model calculates discharge uniformity (CU) until it is ≥ 85 %, at which point it stops and displays determining the lateral flow rate (QT), pressure (HT), and length (LL) for each value of CU ≥ 85 - 90, ≥ 90 - 95, and≥ 95 %. The correlation factor (R2) between measured and estimated qb by (E1) and (E2) was 0.98 and 0.93 % for ID 8.8 mm and (0.76 and 0.81 %) for ID 13.6 mm, respectively. Although the R2 between measured and predicted qb was reduced by ID increasing, the correlation remained high. As a result, an ID of 13.6 mm or less is often recommended. According to the results, using this model to design a simple low-head bubbler irrigation system is both effective and reliable. In terms of water conservation, it could be a viable alternative to traditional furrow irrigation. conservation, it could be a viable alternative to traditional furrow irrigation.
Keywords
Design Software; low-head; Bubbler; Discharge; Uniformity
Statistics
Article View: 294
PDF Download: 360
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.