• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Moussa, A., Mohamed, M. (2005). A STUDY OF DIFFERENT HARVESTING METHODS FOR SUNFLOWER. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 30(6), 3271-3283. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2005.235730
A. I. Moussa; M. I. Mohamed. "A STUDY OF DIFFERENT HARVESTING METHODS FOR SUNFLOWER". Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 30, 6, 2005, 3271-3283. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2005.235730
Moussa, A., Mohamed, M. (2005). 'A STUDY OF DIFFERENT HARVESTING METHODS FOR SUNFLOWER', Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 30(6), pp. 3271-3283. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2005.235730
Moussa, A., Mohamed, M. A STUDY OF DIFFERENT HARVESTING METHODS FOR SUNFLOWER. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2005; 30(6): 3271-3283. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2005.235730

A STUDY OF DIFFERENT HARVESTING METHODS FOR SUNFLOWER

Article 2, Volume 30, Issue 6, June 2005, Page 3271-3283  XML PDF (624.21 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jssae.2005.235730
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
A. I. Moussa; M. I. Mohamed
Agrlc. Eng. Res. institute
Abstract
Field experiments were carried out during seasons 2003 and 2004 at Nuban’a region for harvesting sunflower (Euro-flower) in calcareous soil. Two mechanical harvesting methods (mower then thresher) and combine harvester were compared with traditional method (manual then thresher). The mechanical harvesting methods were done at five different field speeds 2.5, 3.1. 3.6 4.0 and 4.5 krrtih for mower and combine. Three different drum speeds (450. 500 and 550 rpm) were also effected on grain losses and damaged grain for combine and thresher machines at three different moisture contents 878, 10.68 and 13.37 %. Field capacity. Fuel consumption, power and energy requirements were calculated. The experimentai results showed that the highest losses for mower and combine header were 4.19 % and 3.03 % respectively at forward speed 4.5 kmfh and moisture content 878 % besides sickle loss was 3.59% at the same moisture content. Increasing thresher drum speed from 450 to 550 rpm increase threshing losses about 0.46 % and damaged grain by 1.35 % at feed rate of 1 Mgih. Total combine grain lessee was 7.27 % at field speed 2.5 km/h, drum speed 450 rpm and moisture content 8.78 % (including grain damaged). The actual field capacity was low under sickle (one labor can harvest 0.025 fedlh) and mower. Actual fieid capacity increased about 2.8 times with combine than mower under the whole fonvard speeds. Combine consumed the lowest energy 33.96 ktfed compared with mechanical method 57.24 kWh/fed at field speed 4.5 kmrh and traditional methods. 34.62 kWhifed (at thresher drum speed 550 rpm). The highest criterion cost with manual is 113.03 LEifed at grain moisture content 8.78 %. in the mean time; the highest criterion cost with mower is 94.39 LE/fed at field speed 4.5 kmfh‘ and grain moisture content 8.78 %. The highest criterion cost with thresher is 175.10 LElfed at drum speed 550 rpm and grain moisture content 8.78 %. The highest criterion cost with combine harvester is 202.96 LErfed at field speed 4.5 km/h: drum speed 550 rpm and grain moisture content 8.78 %.
Statistics
Article View: 88
PDF Download: 248
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.