• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Zaghluol, K., ELNaggar, A., Salih, M. (2014). CLOGGING EVALUATION OF SIX EMITTERS AS AFFECTED BY SUSPENDED SAND PARTICLES IN IRRIGATION WATER. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 5(5), 645-657. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2014.49376
k. F. Zaghluol; A. M. ELNaggar; M. A. Salih. "CLOGGING EVALUATION OF SIX EMITTERS AS AFFECTED BY SUSPENDED SAND PARTICLES IN IRRIGATION WATER". Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 5, 5, 2014, 645-657. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2014.49376
Zaghluol, K., ELNaggar, A., Salih, M. (2014). 'CLOGGING EVALUATION OF SIX EMITTERS AS AFFECTED BY SUSPENDED SAND PARTICLES IN IRRIGATION WATER', Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 5(5), pp. 645-657. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2014.49376
Zaghluol, K., ELNaggar, A., Salih, M. CLOGGING EVALUATION OF SIX EMITTERS AS AFFECTED BY SUSPENDED SAND PARTICLES IN IRRIGATION WATER. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2014; 5(5): 645-657. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2014.49376

CLOGGING EVALUATION OF SIX EMITTERS AS AFFECTED BY SUSPENDED SAND PARTICLES IN IRRIGATION WATER

Article 3, Volume 5, Issue 5, May 2014, Page 645-657  XML PDF (661.32 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jssae.2014.49376
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
k. F. Zaghluol1; A. M. ELNaggar2; M. A. Salih1
1Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt.
2Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt
Abstract
Six different types of emitters were selected for clogging susceptibility, (GR in line, Fan on line, Turbo key on line, Micro jet on line, Button on line, and Katif on line). The setup of the system consists of centrifugal pump (0.5 HP), reservoir (0.80 x0.60 x0.60m) contains water with suspended particles, tray (1m x 2m) with a height of 20 cm provided with sink pipe to collect water that comes out from emitters back to the reservoir, and piping network from the pump to the lateral lines at the upper edge of the tray. The system provided with bypass valve and pressure gauge mechanism not only to adjust the operating pressure at 1 bar but also to agitate the suspended solid in water (sand particles) during the test. Tap water source was used after adding sand particles (diameter <0.1mm) with concentration of 2 gram/liter. Emitter discharges were measured in cyclic duration (each 15 minutes). According to ASAE (1997), the coefficient of variation (Cv) of all tested emitter was good, except Em6 which was of average classification. Based on the coefficient of variation criteria the systems performance emitter discharge decrease with increasing operation time. The more sensitive emitters for clogging are Em1 and Em5 (GR in Line emitter and Button on Line emitter) respectively. While the most stand without clogging was Em6 (Katif on Line emitter). The recommended emitters are Katif on Line, and Micro jet on Line emitter. It is not recommended to use GR in Line emitter and Button on Line emitters under such conditions of suspended particles.
Keywords
Trickle irrigation; emitter; clogging; sand particles
Statistics
Article View: 155
PDF Download: 432
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.