• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Abdou, S., Farrag, F., El-Akram, M., Ashry, M. (2011). WATER RELATIONS AND YIELD OF WHEAT UNDER DIFFERENT N- FERTILIZER FORMS AND SCHEDULING IRRIGATION. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2(1), 25-41. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2011.55092
S. M. M. Abdou; F. R. M. Farrag; M. F. I. El-Akram; M. R. K. Ashry. "WATER RELATIONS AND YIELD OF WHEAT UNDER DIFFERENT N- FERTILIZER FORMS AND SCHEDULING IRRIGATION". Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2, 1, 2011, 25-41. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2011.55092
Abdou, S., Farrag, F., El-Akram, M., Ashry, M. (2011). 'WATER RELATIONS AND YIELD OF WHEAT UNDER DIFFERENT N- FERTILIZER FORMS AND SCHEDULING IRRIGATION', Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2(1), pp. 25-41. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2011.55092
Abdou, S., Farrag, F., El-Akram, M., Ashry, M. WATER RELATIONS AND YIELD OF WHEAT UNDER DIFFERENT N- FERTILIZER FORMS AND SCHEDULING IRRIGATION. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2011; 2(1): 25-41. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2011.55092

WATER RELATIONS AND YIELD OF WHEAT UNDER DIFFERENT N- FERTILIZER FORMS AND SCHEDULING IRRIGATION

Article 3, Volume 2, Issue 1, January 2011, Page 25-41  XML PDF (567.87 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jssae.2011.55092
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
S. M. M. Abdou; F. R. M. Farrag; M. F. I. El-Akram; M. R. K. Ashry
Soils and Water and Environment Res. Inst., A.R.C., Giza, Egypt
Abstract
Field experiment was conducted at Tamia Agric., Res., Station, Fayoum, Egypt during 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 seasons to study the effect of N- fertilizer forms, i.e. F1: organic form as chicken manure at the rate of 20m3fed-1, F2: bio-fertilizer (biogena)+37.5 kg mineral N as ammonium nitrate 33.0% N and F3: mineral N fertilizer at the rate of 75 kg N fed-1 (as ammonium nitrate 33.0% N) and scheduling irrigation treatments, i.e. I1: irrigation at 0.8 cumulative pan evaporation (C.P.E.), I2: irrigation at 1.0 and I3: irrigation at 1.2 C.P.E.  on yield, yield components and some water relations of wheat crop (Giza 168 cv.). A split-plot design with four replicates was used since N- fertilizer forms were represented in the main plots while scheduling irrigation treatments were occupied the split ones.
The main obtained results were as follows:
1- Using mineral N form and irrigation at 1.2 C.P.E. gave the highest averages of spike numbers m-2, 1000-grain weight, grain yield fed-1. (2149.28 and 2271.50 kg fed-1) and straw yield (2619.60 and 2775.85 kg fed-1) in the two successive seasons, but plant height was affected significantly in the second season only. The lowest averages of yield and its components were obtained from using organic fertilizer(chicken manure) form and irrigation at 0.8 C.P.E. in both seasons.
2- Seasonal consumptive use (ETC) averaged 39.23 and 41.83 cm in 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 seasons, respectively. The highest ETC values, i.e. 44.12 and 46.36 cm were recorded with the interaction (F3I3), whereas the lowest values as 35.65 and 38.72 cm resulted from the interaction (F1I1), in 2008/2009 and 2009 /2010, respectively,
3- Daily ETC rates were low during Nov. and Dec., then increased during Jan. and Feb., to reach its maximum values during March and then declined again at April till harvesting. The values of daily ETC decreased due to organic or bio-fertilizer forms in the two growing season's months. The crop coefficient (KC) values (averages of the two seasons) were 0.53, 0.61, 0.70, 0.79, 0.93, 0.61 and 0.52 for, Nov., Dec., Jan., Feb., Mar., Apr. and May, respectively.
4- The highest water use efficiency, i.e. 1.27 and 1.29 kg grain m-3 water consumed were obtained from the interaction of (F3I3) in 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 seasons, respectively.
Keywords
Wheat yield; yield components; N fertilizer forms; scheduling irrigation and water relations
Statistics
Article View: 155
PDF Download: 724
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.