• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Ismail, Z., Ismail, N., Hamza, Z. (2021). Productivity Modeling of Collect-Packing Machine for Garden-Residues. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 12(3), 179-183. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2021.160422
Z. E. Ismail; N. K. Ismail; Z. S. Hamza. "Productivity Modeling of Collect-Packing Machine for Garden-Residues". Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 12, 3, 2021, 179-183. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2021.160422
Ismail, Z., Ismail, N., Hamza, Z. (2021). 'Productivity Modeling of Collect-Packing Machine for Garden-Residues', Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 12(3), pp. 179-183. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2021.160422
Ismail, Z., Ismail, N., Hamza, Z. Productivity Modeling of Collect-Packing Machine for Garden-Residues. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2021; 12(3): 179-183. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2021.160422

Productivity Modeling of Collect-Packing Machine for Garden-Residues

Article 14, Volume 12, Issue 3, March 2021, Page 179-183  XML PDF (919.68 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jssae.2021.160422
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Z. E. Ismail email 1; N. K. Ismail2; Z. S. Hamza3
1Engineering Dept, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Egypt Egypt.
2Bio-system Eng. Dept., Agric. Eng. Res. Inst. (AEnRI), ARC
3Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Mansoura Univ.
Abstract
The collecting of garden-residues (leaves, seeds, flowers, ... etc.) using a modest machines is not done as a completely mechanization operations. For these reasons, the aim of this work was identified to constructive, confirm and investigate a machine to collect and packing the garden residues, which included two main units, the collecting and delivery units. The variable parameters comprise revolutions of blower "RB" (1000; 1700; 2400 and 3100rpm) and delivery tube diameter "DTD" (10; 15 and 20cm) under two residues moisture contents "RMC" of 14% (free dropped) and 64% (forced dropped). The performance of collect-packing machine “CPM” were done by identifying residues bulk density "BD" at go out moment and rate of residues volume reduction "RV", machine productivity "RP" and specific energy consumed "SEC". Then the regression modeling was identified as combine relationship among studied variables. The results concluded that the “CPM” is suitable for collecting free and forced dropped garden residues. The best level of the “RB” and “DTD” are 3100 rpm and 15 cm under 14% “RMC” and 3100 rpm and 20 cm for 64% “RMC” respectively. At “RMC” of 14%, the highest “BD”, “RV”, and “RP” are 45.3kg m-3, 29.22% and 257.26 kg h-1 respectively at lowest “SEC” of 0.196 kW h Mg-1. The corresponding values at “RMC” of 64% were 32.32 kg m-3, 88.01%,  and  294.79 kg h-1 at “SEC” of 0.251 kW h Mg-1 respectively. The regression modeling has a strong relation to describe the effect of studied variables under different machine performance.
Keywords
Blower; Bulk density; Collecting residues; Delivery; Packing; Volume reduction
Statistics
Article View: 219
PDF Download: 482
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.