• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Yousef, K., Mohmed, M., Mohmed, E., Galal, M., EI-Gendy, R. (2004). DETECTING SOIL MOISTURE RETENTION CURVE FROM I SITU MEASUREMENTS. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 29(2), 997-1012. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2004.240821
Kholod M. Yousef; M.A. Mohmed; EI- Hasnaa A. Mohmed; M.E. Galal; R. W. EI-Gendy. "DETECTING SOIL MOISTURE RETENTION CURVE FROM I SITU MEASUREMENTS". Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 29, 2, 2004, 997-1012. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2004.240821
Yousef, K., Mohmed, M., Mohmed, E., Galal, M., EI-Gendy, R. (2004). 'DETECTING SOIL MOISTURE RETENTION CURVE FROM I SITU MEASUREMENTS', Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 29(2), pp. 997-1012. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2004.240821
Yousef, K., Mohmed, M., Mohmed, E., Galal, M., EI-Gendy, R. DETECTING SOIL MOISTURE RETENTION CURVE FROM I SITU MEASUREMENTS. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2004; 29(2): 997-1012. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2004.240821

DETECTING SOIL MOISTURE RETENTION CURVE FROM I SITU MEASUREMENTS

Article 5, Volume 29, Issue 2, February 2004, Page 997-1012  XML PDF (2.29 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jssae.2004.240821
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Kholod M. Yousef1; M.A. Mohmed1; EI- Hasnaa A. Mohmed2; M.E. Galal2; R. W. EI-Gendy1
1Soil and Water Res. Dept. Nuclear Res. Center, A.E.A., Cairo, Egypt.
2Soils Dept. Fae. Agric. Ain Shams Univ Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
,This work aims to detect soil moisture retention curve of sandy soil up to 15
bars using in situ measurements of tensiometers and neutron probe. An experiment
had been conducted in Inshas at the Farm of Soil and Water Researches Department.
Nuclear Researches Center. Atomic Energy Authority. Tensiometers and neutron
moisture meter were used to determine soil matric potentials and soil moisture
contents (9), simultaneously. Some values of soil matric potential in tensiometric
range and the versus moisture contents were' used to calculate van Genuchten
parameters (m, n, and q.). This method Called tensiometric method. This method and
van Genuchten method are differed through tho calculation of these parameters,
where van Genuchten's depends on all data of 9 and II until 15 bars while in
tensiometric -method depends on e and h in tensiometnc range only. The outputs of
these 'methods had been tested statistically and compared with different methods to
evaluate .its outputs.
The' obtained data showed no significant differences between the outputs of
tensiometric. Brooks- Corey, and modified Brooks, Corey methods in the range of the
experimental data, whenever van Genuchten, Campbell and its modified method were
non- significant differ~nces for the two depths. Brooks - Corey and Campbell's
methods gave- abnormal data at saturation point.
Calculations of tenslomelric method are' easier than van Genuchten's one
and it considered field one because it depends on the in situ measurements.
Keywords
Tensiometer; Neutron probe; Soil moisture retention curve; Air entry suction
Statistics
Article View: 69
PDF Download: 265
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.