• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Abdellatif, S., El-Hadidi, Y., Farouk, H., Mosad, G. (2023). Solar Drying Tomato Crop Using Two Different Architectural Configurations of Solar Driers. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 14(9), 275-286. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2023.228542.1176
S. M. Abdellatif; Y. M. El-Hadidi; Hameda K. Farouk; Ghada A Mosad. "Solar Drying Tomato Crop Using Two Different Architectural Configurations of Solar Driers". Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 14, 9, 2023, 275-286. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2023.228542.1176
Abdellatif, S., El-Hadidi, Y., Farouk, H., Mosad, G. (2023). 'Solar Drying Tomato Crop Using Two Different Architectural Configurations of Solar Driers', Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 14(9), pp. 275-286. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2023.228542.1176
Abdellatif, S., El-Hadidi, Y., Farouk, H., Mosad, G. Solar Drying Tomato Crop Using Two Different Architectural Configurations of Solar Driers. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2023; 14(9): 275-286. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2023.228542.1176

Solar Drying Tomato Crop Using Two Different Architectural Configurations of Solar Driers

Article 4, Volume 14, Issue 9, September 2023, Page 275-286  XML PDF (1.46 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jssae.2023.228542.1176
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
S. M. Abdellatif; Y. M. El-Hadidi; Hameda K. Farouk email ; Ghada A Mosad
Dept. of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agric. Mansoura University
Abstract
This study was conducted during August 2022 to clearly elucidate and assess the best type of solar driers can be functioned in tomatoes drying and the engineering parameters that affecting the drying process. Two different architectural forms of solar- driers (lean-to and curved lean-to solar driers) are designing, constructing, and using during the experimental work. The tomato fruits handily cut into halves lengthwise and thereafter 5% sodium chloride (NaCl) was spread on the cutting part of fruits before entrance the solar driers. This manipulating process had executed in order to facilitate the up tacking of moisture from the core of fruits into the cutting part. The two solar driers have compared with the natural sun drying methods during this study. The mean initial moisture content of tomato fruits was 91.52%w.b., which reduced into 7%w.b. (±0.74 w.b.) after drying within 68 and 95 hours for the two solar driers, respectively, while it reached to 15.64%w.b. within 178 hours for the natural sun drying. The drying rates for the two solar driers, respectively, were 284.44 g/h and 205.52 g/h, while, it was 101.93 g/h, for the natural sun drying. The experimental analysis for the two solar driers and the natural sun drying revealed that, the total energy needed for drying fresh tomato fruits comprehended solar energy and electrical energy consumed by extracting fans, respectively, was 27.453, 40.457, and 22.065 kWh. As a result, the specific free water extraction rate by the three different drying systems, of 0.738, 0.503, and 0.907 kg/kWh, respectively.
Keywords
Solar radiation; dehydrating; solar dehydrator
Statistics
Article View: 163
PDF Download: 390
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.