• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Soliman, E. (2025). An Empirical Model to Predict the Rice Crop Response to the Total Soil Water Potential and Soil Compaction under Irrigation with Alternate Wetting and Drying Technology. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 16(6), 177-185. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2025.367547.1277
Enas Soliman. "An Empirical Model to Predict the Rice Crop Response to the Total Soil Water Potential and Soil Compaction under Irrigation with Alternate Wetting and Drying Technology". Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 16, 6, 2025, 177-185. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2025.367547.1277
Soliman, E. (2025). 'An Empirical Model to Predict the Rice Crop Response to the Total Soil Water Potential and Soil Compaction under Irrigation with Alternate Wetting and Drying Technology', Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 16(6), pp. 177-185. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2025.367547.1277
Soliman, E. An Empirical Model to Predict the Rice Crop Response to the Total Soil Water Potential and Soil Compaction under Irrigation with Alternate Wetting and Drying Technology. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2025; 16(6): 177-185. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2025.367547.1277

An Empirical Model to Predict the Rice Crop Response to the Total Soil Water Potential and Soil Compaction under Irrigation with Alternate Wetting and Drying Technology

Article 5, Volume 16, Issue 6, June 2025, Page 177-185  XML PDF (688.49 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jssae.2025.367547.1277
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Enas Soliman email orcid
Soils Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University - 35516, Mansoura, Egypt
Abstract
Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) is a water-saving technology that flooded rice fields can apply to
reduce water use in irrigated fields. This study aims to predict rice production by the function of total soil water
potentials, and to examine the relationship between the total soil water potential (TSWP, Ψt) and soil compaction.
A field experiment was carried out during the summer season of 2022, the treatments were either maintained
flooded, equilibrated to −10 kPa (A0), or dried to −20 kPa (A1), or dried to −30 kPa (A2) and then re-flooded at the
water potential of −10 kPa (A0 - control). The previous treatments were along with two nitrogen levels (N1 = 124,
and N2 = 165 kg N ha−1) that represents 75 and 100% of the recommended dose with three replications. The AWD
increased the pores percentage slightly, but it has a clear trend in increasing the soil mechanical resistance and
macro-porosity. Also, the TSWP function could be used to predict the rice yield in early time. The AWD technique
(at matric potential of −20 kPa) could save water to about 25% with a relative yield (Yr) of 70% (at 75% N level).
This investigation showed the possibility of using simple empirical tool to describe the rice crop response to the Ψt
changes and soil compaction using a low number of inputs with an accurate and rapid determination. These results
have shown a high agreement between the predicted values and the experimental (R2) at a range of (0.91–0.97).
Keywords
Water potential; Alternative wetting and drying; Soil compaction; Rice yield
Statistics
Article View: 9
PDF Download: 11
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.