• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Khadr, K., El-Bakhshwan, M., Aboul-nour, H. (2009). EVALUATION OF THE JAPANESE RICE COMBINE HARVESTERS USED AFTER RECOMMENDED SALVAGE LIFE. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 34(2), 1513-1525. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2009.90277
K. A. A. Khadr; M. K. El-Bakhshwan; H. M. Aboul-nour. "EVALUATION OF THE JAPANESE RICE COMBINE HARVESTERS USED AFTER RECOMMENDED SALVAGE LIFE". Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 34, 2, 2009, 1513-1525. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2009.90277
Khadr, K., El-Bakhshwan, M., Aboul-nour, H. (2009). 'EVALUATION OF THE JAPANESE RICE COMBINE HARVESTERS USED AFTER RECOMMENDED SALVAGE LIFE', Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 34(2), pp. 1513-1525. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2009.90277
Khadr, K., El-Bakhshwan, M., Aboul-nour, H. EVALUATION OF THE JAPANESE RICE COMBINE HARVESTERS USED AFTER RECOMMENDED SALVAGE LIFE. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2009; 34(2): 1513-1525. doi: 10.21608/jssae.2009.90277

EVALUATION OF THE JAPANESE RICE COMBINE HARVESTERS USED AFTER RECOMMENDED SALVAGE LIFE

Article 6, Volume 34, Issue 2, February 2009, Page 1513-1525  XML PDF (560.03 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jssae.2009.90277
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
K. A. A. Khadr; M. K. El-Bakhshwan; H. M. Aboul-nour
Agric. Eng. Res. Inst., Agric.Res. Center, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the anticipated performance and costs of Yanmar, C-385EG and Kubota, R2-48 rice combine harvesters, when used after their recommended salvage life (the first five operating years). The study includes the operating conditions throughout the second five years of combine's life (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, and the average Ta) compared with the average values of the first five operating years (T0). The obtained results indicated that the total harvested area, actual field capacity, field efficiency, revenues and total costs decreased in average by 45.3, 37.6, 37.5, 45.9 and 58.3% respectively, for Yanmar combine and by 36.8, 24.3, 24.1, 28.2, and 56.7% respectively, for Kubota combine. While the operating costs and net gain increased with the average of 25.2 and 18.5% for Yanmar combine and 23.1 and 30.4% for Kubota combine. The Kubota combine gave the higher values of harvested area, actual field capacity, field efficiency, revenues, operating costs, net gain, and lower value of total costs as compared with the Yanmar combine. The statistical analysis revealed no significant effect of T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 on the harvested area, actual field capacity, field efficiency, revenues, operating costs and net gain, while there is a low effect of the same treatments on the total costs with Kubota combine. On the other hand, there is a high significant effect of the treatments on harvested area, actual field capacity, and field efficiency and simple effect on the total costs while there is no significant effect on the revenues, operating costs and net gain of Yanmar combine.
Statistics
Article View: 131
PDF Download: 549
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.